Literature Review of Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance through Environmental Strategy and Green Capability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61656/3c719c89Kata Kunci:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental Performance, Environmental Strategy, Green Capability, Literature ReviewAbstrak
This study synthesizes the literature on corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a determinant of environmental performance, both directly and through the mediating mechanisms of environmental strategy and green capability, among manufacturing companies in Indonesia. Using a qualitative literature review/document analysis method, theoretical and empirical sources published between 2000 and 2022 were analyzed, framed by the natural resource-based view and motivated by an unpublished undergraduate thesis proposal examining manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The review indicates that CSR has no significant direct effect on environmental performance, but is consistently and positively related to environmental strategy and green capability, each of which in turn significantly and positively predicts environmental performance. Seven research propositions are advanced, and a conceptual framework linking CSR to environmental performance, both directly and through environmental strategy and green capability, is proposed to guide future empirical validation among manufacturing companies in Indonesia.
Unduhan
Referensi
Amaranti, R., Govindaraju, R., & Irianto, D. (2019). Green dynamic capability for enhancing green innovations performance in a manufacturing company: A conceptual framework. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 703(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/703/1/012023
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556363
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bowen, H. R., & Johnson, F. E. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman (1st ed.). Harper and Brothers. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL6132911M/Social_Responsibilities_of_the_Businessman
Brundtland, G. H. (Ed.). (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n87/184/67/pdf/n8718467.pdf
Galbreath, J., & Shum, P. (2012). Do customer satisfaction and reputation mediate the CSR–FP link? Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211432941
Hardiyanti, E., & Suryaningrum, D. H. (2021). Pengaruh corporate social responsibility terhadap financial performance studi pada sektor perbankan yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2014–2020. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, dan Akuntansi), 5(3), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v5i3.1489
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9512280033
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219
Hernández, J. P., Benito, Y. A., & Juan, M. G. (2020). Moderating effect of firm size on the influence of corporate social responsibility in the economic performance of micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119774
Huang, S. Z., Chau, K. Y., Chien, F., & Shen, H. (2020). The impact of startups’ dual learning on their green innovation capability: The effects of business executives’ environmental awareness and environmental regulations. Sustainability, 12(16), 6526. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166526
Indrianto, A. P., Kusmantini, T., & Sugandini, D. (2022). Green capabilities mediate the effect of green supply chain management practices on farmers business performance and vegetable non-pesticide (Study on “Lestari” Women Farmer Group in Bantul Regency). Technium Social Sciences Journal, 27, 639–658. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v27i1.4951
IQAir. (2021). 2021 World air quality report: Region & city PM2.5 ranking. IQAir. https://www.iqair.com/world-air-quality-report
Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00092
Kementerian BUMN. (2007). Peraturan Menteri BUMN Nomor Per-05/MBU/2007 tentang Program Kemitraan Badan Usaha Milik Negara dengan Usaha Kecil dan Program Bina Lingkungan. Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara. https://www.bpkp.go.id/public/upload/unit/dan/files/PER07MBU2013-Perubahan%20Ketiga%20Atas%20Per05MBU2007%20Tentang%20PKBL.PDF
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2019). Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (PROPER). https://proper.kemenlh.go.id/proper/home
Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120262
Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Wamba, S. F., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106
Mattmann, M., Logar, I., & Brouwer, R. (2016). Hydropower externalities: A meta-analysis. Energy Economics, 57, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.04.016
Menguc, B., & Ozanne, L. K. (2005). Challenges of the “green imperative”: A natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.002
Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2007a). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal. Sekretariat Negara. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39903/uu-no-25-tahun-2007
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2007b). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Sekretariat Negara. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/39965
Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2022). Environmental strategies and human resource development consistency: Research in the manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129538
Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1780
Rahmawati, A. (2023). Pengaruh CSR terhadap kinerja lingkungan dengan strategi lingkungan dan green capability sebagai variabel mediasi pada perusahaan manufaktur di Indonesia [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur. https://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/19263/
Rehman, S. U., Bresciani, S., Yahiaoui, D., & Giacosa, E. (2022). Environmental sustainability orientation and corporate social responsibility influence on environmental performance of small and medium enterprises: The mediating effect of green capability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(6), 1954–1967. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2293
Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–960. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280026
Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: Mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(5), 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2016-0046
Sull, D. (2009, February). How to thrive in turbulent markets. Harvard Business Review, 87(2), 78–88. https://hbr.org/2009/02/how-to-thrive-in-turbulent-markets
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.820
Suryaningrum, D. H. (2024). Teori-teori Dalam Penelitian Teknologi Informasi dan Akuntansi Keperilakuan, Mutiara Intelektual Indonesia Press. https://www.academia.edu/144404615/Teori_teori_Dalam_Penelitian_Teknologi_Informasi_dan_Akuntansi_Keperilakuan
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W., & De Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.551
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
Zailani, S., Jeyaraman, K., Vengadasan, G., & Premkumar, R. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2019 Aprillia Rahmawati, Diah Hari Suryaningrum
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
